Connect with us
https://propermanchester.com.temp.link/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/secret-suppers-advert.jpg

TV & Film

Girl hasn’t spoken to mum in over three years due to tattoo that tore family apart

Thoughts?

Alex Watson

Published

on

A Current Affair

Almost everyone worries about telling their mum they got a tattoo, but this mum’s reaction was seriously bad.

Casey was only 16 at the time of getting her dreamcatcher tattoo on her ankle, meaning she needed parent’s signed permission. 

At the time she was living with her dad who agreed she could get the tat, which symbolises luck and has special meaning to her. 

But her father has now been charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm and wounding a person with the intent to cause grievous bodily harm by Casey’s mum. 

A Current Affair

The latter charge has now been dropped, however the assault charge remains and could result in five years imprisonment for the dad who pleaded not guilty. 

Casey’s mum has lodged court proceedings over the incident saying the decision was made without her consent.

Casey has not spoken to her mum since. 

Speaking on Australian TV, Casey’s dad said: “I’ll do anything for Casey, to protect my daughter. Yeah, I would go to extreme [lengths for] all my kids. They mean the world to me.”

A Current Affair

Casey then explained that she hadn’t spoken to her mother in years, saying: “I haven’t spoken to mum in 3 years.”

She added that her dad was ‘all I could ever ask for. He’s the best dad. He does everything for me’.

She explained: “I can go to him about anything, teaches me how to do stuff, can ask him anything. He’s always there for me when I need help.”

Sam Macedone, a lawyer, also appeared on the TV show and explained that it is legal for one parent to give consent. He explained: “Having this man charged with assaulting her is, in my mind, ridiculous.”

The GBH charge has been dropped but the ABH is still being fought. 

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

TV & Film

Loose Women viewers left divided after debate on banning school non-uniform days

The panellists clashed.

Proper Manchester

Published

on

loosewomen/Twitter

Loose Women panellists clashed over whether school non-uniform days should be banned or not.

Was there anything more upsetting than forgetting about a non-uniform day in school? From experience, no there definitely wasn’t.

Yesterday, Loose Women viewers were left completely divided after a live debate discussing the issue of possibly banning non-uniform days.

The discussion came about as more and more headteachers are cancelling costume and non-uniform days due to concerns about them being unfair to children who may not be able to afford clothes to wear.

Studies have revealed that there has been a spike in the number of children missing school on non-uniform days.

During the live discussion, Stacey said: “It’s a hard one. I do totally emphasise with anyone who dreads non-uniform day, especially if they can’t afford a costume.

Although she additionally stated that she doesn’t think they should be cancelled, she added: “I do think it’s nice for the kids and I don’t think the kids worry as much as the adults do. The other day it was ‘wear red day’ for racism and I just gave Leighton one of Zach’s tops to wear – he wasn’t bothered
at all.”

Brenda disagreed, referring to her own experiences at school. She said: “I don’t think it’s a parent thing. For me, there were three lots of clothes – home, church and school uniform. I like a school uniform, it shows unity, there’s no reason for someone to pick you out of a crowd.

“It [non-uniform days] runs a risk of making that child feel like they’re left out of something.”

Loose Women viewers were divided by the debate with some supporting the view that they should be cancelled.

One tweeted, “When I was at school, I hated non-uniform days. As there was always the ‘pressure to look a certain way etc. It puts more pressure on the children and could create an opportunity for bullying”.

However, one disagreed tweeting “Banning non-school uniform days is nonsense”

Continue Reading

TV & Film

The Haunting of Bly Manor is now streaming on Netflix

Just in time for Halloween!

Alex Watson

Published

on

Netflix

The Haunting of Bly Manor comes to Netflix today, just in time for Halloween.

It’s the sequel to The Haunting of Hill House, the hit Netflix series that terrified everyone two years ago.

It’s part of The Haunting anthology and will have no connection to The Haunting of Hill House, with completely new storylines, characters and of course, a brand new terrifying house. 

And if you’re looking for something to binge, it’s being released with 10 episodes – making it the perfect thing to do this weekend (if you’re hard enough).

The Haunting of Bly Manor is based on Henry James’ ‘The Turn of the Screw’, a novella horror from 1898 that centres around two children, Flora and Miles, in a country house in Essex.

However, Netflix’s version will be set in the 1980s. Here’s what you can expect of the plot: “After an au pair’s tragic death, Henry Wingrave hires a young American nanny to care for his orphaned niece and nephew who reside at Bly Manor with the estate’s chef Owen, groundskeeper Jamie and housekeeper, Mrs. Grose.

“But all is not as it seems at the manor, and centuries of dark secrets of love and loss are waiting to be unearthed in this chilling gothic romance. At Bly Manor, dead doesn’t mean gone.”

The series features newcomers Amelie Bea Smith and Benjamin Evan Ainsworth, who play the orphaned niece and nephew duo, Flora and Miles. 

The show also features Rahul Kohli as chef Owen, Amelia Eve as the groundskeeper Jamie and T’Nia Miller who you might know from Sex Education as the housekeeper Mrs. Grose.

Bly Manor will also see the return of some of the original cast from Hill House, including Henry Thomas as Henry Wingrave and You’s Victoria Pedretti as Dani Clayton, the American nanny.

The Haunting of Bly Manor has dropped on Netflix today, just in time for a Friday night binge. 

 

Continue Reading

TV & Film

Paul Hollywood’s ‘rainbow bagels represent the NHS’ comment angers Bake Off fans

Twitter is unimpressed by the comment.

Alex Watson

Published

on

HibeeFi & JoshTWheeler/Twitter

Paul Hollywood has ruffled feathers on this week’s Bake Off episode, after saying rainbow bagels ‘represent the NHS’. 

The Great British Bake Off has been back on our screens for three weeks now, previously making headlines and even igniting enough anger in people to complain to Ofcom

This week, the headlines come after Paul referred to rainbow bagels – set as the technical challenge on this week’s episode – as representing the NHS. 

When describing the task in the clip where Paul and Pru try this week’s technical challenge, and we see what it’s actually supposed to look like, Paul said: “I think bagels are a great challenge when you’re making bread.

“You’ve gotta boil them which is unusual. I think the rainbow colours for me, although it originated over in the States, I think it represents the NHS. It does now certainly.”

However, Twitter was having none of it. 

The rainbow flag, designed by Gilbert Baker, has been used by the LGBTQ+ community since 1978, reflecting diversity and gay pride. 

Each chosen colour represents a specific meaning such as ‘Life’, ‘Art’, and ‘Spirit’. 

However most recently, throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, the rainbow has been used to demonstrate our thanks to frontline NHS staff who have worked throughout the pandemic. 

What do you think, are Bake Off’s rainbow bagels for the NHS, Pride or just bagels?

Continue Reading

Receive our latest news, events & unique stories

Privacy and data policy

We may earn a commission when you use one of our links to make a purchase

Copyright © 2019 Proper Manchester