Connect with us
https://propermanchester.com.temp.link/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/secret-suppers-advert.jpg

Feature

The 10 ‘worst places to live’ in England have been named and there’s some surprise entries

The votes have been counted and the results are in…

Published

on

Paul Leonard & Glyn Baker/Geograph

The votes are in for the ‘worst places to live’ in England in 2021, and there’s some surprise news for Greater Manchester.

Peterborough has taken the top spot for two years running now, based on ilivehere.co.uk’s yearly audience vote, so it’s about time to see if the city will do it again or if someone else can steal the crown this year. 

A whopping 125,681 people voted for the tongue-in-cheek survey this year, and it turns out most people voted between 9am and 5pm from a laptop or desktop computer, which means you were all enjoying plenty of time dossin’ about this year! 

Don’t blame you to be honest, let’s see who’s on the list…

Tim Green/Wikimedia

10) Halifax

Taking the tenth spot for another year, is the town ‘you only know because of the Building Society’ with the same name. I Live Here point out that the second claim to fame is that Ed Sheeran was born there. 

I’ve also got it on good authority that Acapulco Club (or the Acca to the locals) is the best place to get a 75p drink, and boasts one of the stickiest dancefloors in the UK. Here’s what people had to say:

“I soon realised that I would need an interpreter in Halifax as the locals spoke only in grunts and squints”

9) Torquay 

The ‘English Riviera’ town which is apparently famous for ‘not a lot’ takes the ninth spot on the list, and is a surprise new entry for 2021. Some super friendly reviews include…

“Torquay is probably the only seaside town in England where ch@vs outnumber seagulls”

“If you don’t have a kid by the age of 20, are you really from Torquay?”

Glyn Baker/Geograph

8) Jaywick

Never heard of it? Me neither. Making its debut on the list is Jaywick, which is known for being the most deprived area in England and is located by Clacton-on-Sea in Essex.

“A seaside sh#thole where slumlords live in the Brooklands houses that overlook the beach, while letting out ramshackle glorified sheds behind them to the poor and destitute”

7) Luton 

I quite literally know nothing about Luton – another new entry – other than it has an airport, which makes for a pretty boring tourism sign. Wikipedia has enlightened me that it in fact is home to one of the largest churches in Bedfordshire, was known for its hat making and had a car production plan until 2002 when it closed.

Lot going on, then… 

“England’s toilet”

“One of the most shocking moments of my year stay in Luton was on Christmas day. I went with my friend in his car to pick up some relatives. Only for my friend to point out the local McDonald’s. Explaining to me that it gets busier every year”

Tim Green/Flickr

6) Wakefield

This place finally burst into the top ten list last year and is now up two places. Wakey is (apparently) known for a Coronation Street actor. 

My favourite thing about Wakefield is Westgate Railway Station – the gateway out of the place”

“Wakefield’s cultural wilderness is astonishing. Its claim to fame is that it is the Rhubarb Capital Of The UK. Seriously”

5) Hull

The UK’s most undeserving Culture Capital, Hull comes back in the list slap bang in the middle. It didn’t make the cut last year so well done Hull. 

“It’s like God’s little experiment if he put the worst of everything into one pot and stirred it up a bit”

“I personally recommend a day trip to Hull for all families, perhaps instead of a day trip to the zoo”

4)  Bradford

According to I Live Here, ‘it would not be a Top 10 without a smattering of West Yorkshire’s finest taking the top spots’. 

“Bradford, the land of opportunity, if it’s a takeaway or a pound shop you dream of opening”

LivingOS/Flickr

3) Liverpool

Taking home the bronze medal for quite simply existing is Liverpool, another new entry to the top ten. 

“I can’t put into words just how miserable growing up in this horrid place has been. The people attempt to grind you and your individuality down because they fear people with more than single digit IQs and who dress in clothes other than the latest black track suit”

2) Huddersfield

In second place is Huddersfield. Hudds has a special place in my heart if for nothing else but Bar Maroc. But alas taking home the crown just isn’t meant to be for this place.

“Not all of Huddersfield is bad… just 70% of it”

Paul Bryan/Geograph

1) Peterborough 

Taking home the top spot is last year’s winner, and the year before that too, Peterborough! Pause for applause. Stunning. Well done Peterborough. 

The atmosphere in Peterborough is draining. You feel totally isolated from the rest of the world and life in general, as though everything else is going on and you’re not part of it as you’re stuck in this dump”

Perhaps the most notable thing about this year’s list is that nowhere in Greater Manchester made the top ten, with at least one borough usually finding its way in there – last year Rochdale came 4th, and Oldham (9th) and Rochdale (3rd) both featured in 2019. 

However, while nowhere in our region made the top ten, if you dig a bit deeper into the top 50 we did feature, with Oldham (17th), Wigan (20th), Rochdale (23rd) and Bolton (29th) all starring.

Oh well, could be worse, Yorkshire seems to consistently have at least four or five places in the top ten every year…

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feature

One in four young people have felt like they were ‘unable to cope’ during pandemic

It’s the worst findings in the survey’s 12-year history

Published

on

Anthony Tran / Unsplash

The Prince’s Trust has recorded the worst findings in the history of its annual young people’s happiness and confidence survey.

The Prince’ Trust is a youth charity designed to help vulnerable young people. Each year the charity undergoes a survey of young people’s happiness and confidence.

This year, the long-running survey found the worst findings in its 12-year history. 

The charity says young people are in danger of giving up on their future and themselves, with a quarter saying they feel unable to cope with life.

The trust’s UK chief executive, Jonathan Townsend, said: “The pandemic has taken a devastating toll on young people’s mental health and wellbeing.

“Many believe they are missing out on being young, and sadly we know that the impact of the pandemic on their employment prospects and overall wellbeing could continue far into their futures.”

The Trusts’ 2020 Youth Index was carried out by YouGov in partnership with Tesco, and found that half of those surveyed said current political and economic events have had effects on their mental health.

Half said they are always or often anxious. This was more prevalent in those not in work, education or training (Neet), rising to 64%.

One in four said they felt unable to cope with life since the start of the pandemic, increasing to 40% in Neet young people.

Since the start of the pandemic, half of the 16-25 year-olds said their mental health has worsened. 

Mr Townsend said: “At this critical time we need businesses, government and individuals to work with us to help as many vulnerable young people as possible. 

“It is only by working together that we can stop this generation of young people giving up on their futures – and themselves.”

Emma Taylor, the UK people director at Tesco, said: “The findings of this year’s Youth Index highlight how vital it is to support young people to develop skills and build their confidence, to support their future. In these extraordinarily difficult times, supporting young people’s mental health is paramount.”

Adam Pester / Manchester’s Finest

Along with the report, the Prince’s Trust has highlighted four habits that can benefit your mental health.

They are:

  1. Establish a routine
  2. Practise gratitude
  3. Keep a journal
  4. Check-in with yourself 

We’ve also put together five top tips to help manage your mental health and wellbeing throughout the lockdown, based on NHS advice.

See what you can do to help your mental wellbeing here

If you are struggling to cope and need to chat to someone you can text shout to 85258 and speak to a trained volunteer. If you need urgent support visit here. Whatever you are going through, you don’t need to face it alone! 

Continue Reading

Feature

Five things a scientist wants anti-vaxxers to know about coronavirus vaccines

The most common myths debunked

Published

on

U.S. Secretary of Defense/Flickr & DrRosena/Twitter

A medicine cell biologist has cleared up some of the popular vaccination myths. 

Hundreds of thousands of people are being vaccinated daily across the UK with a plan for 13.9 million people to have their first dose by mid-February.

This accounts for 21% of the population, currently (figures are from January 18th, 2021), 6.1% of the population have had their first dose, according to Public Health England.

However, there are a number of people not convinced about the safety of the vaccination. In the UK, the Centre for Countering Digital Hate suggests 5.4 million people believe in the ‘anti-vaccination movement’.

The anti-vaccination movement is based upon three major claims – all of which remain unsupported by facts: ‘Covid is not dangerous’, ‘vaccines are dangerous’ and ‘experts cannot be trusted’.

HuffPost UK spoke to UCL medicine cell biologist Dr Jennifer Rohn to debunk vaccination myths that are currently circulating.

United Nations

MYTH: ‘Vaccines alter your DNA’

Some rumours have circulated that the vaccine can modify your DNA, this is not only not physically possible but also not backed by a single piece of evidence, like many of the anti-vaccination myths.

Jim Corr, guitarist of Irish group The Corrs, wrote on Twitter: “The vaccine is a novel experimental RNA vaccine which will alter the very DNA of the recipient.”

The key problem with this statement is that it not only represents a complete misunderstanding of how vaccines work, but it is being Tweeted by a ’90s pop star who has no scientific or medical qualifications.

Firstly, DNA and RNA are different things. DNA is a long molecule containing unique genetic code – what we call genes – that are responsible for development, function, growth and reproduction of proteins in each cell of the body.

RNA is of a similar structure however it essentially tells the proteins how to behave. It does this in three ways, including acting as a messenger between DNA and proteins. Here it is called ‘messenger RNA’, known as ‘mRNA’.

Dr Rohn explains that those made by Pfizer and Moderna are mRNA vaccines that use a part of Covid-19’s RNA to tell our cells to produce antigens. The antigens are then recognised by the immune system and prepare it to fight coronavirus.

RNA cannot physically change the coding of DNA, Dr Rohn confirms.

Instead, she thinks people are confusing vaccines with gene therapy, an experimental technique that can be used against cystic fibrosis and some cancers but – crucially – has nothing to do with vaccines, how they are developed or how they work.

MYTH: ‘You don’t need the vaccine if others have one’

Back to unqualified musicians on Twitter for such rumours, like Ian Brown, who tweeted: “So if you want a vax and you believe it works and you’ll be protected then you wont mind if i dont have one because you will already be protected. [sic]”

Firstly, the former Stone Roses singer has no scientific or medical qualifications.

Secondly, not everyone can be vaccinated, some have compromised immune systems and others are undergoing certain medical treatments and cannot safely take the vaccine. These people will be relying on the wider population to take the vaccine and therefore indirectly protect them.

Herd immunity, however, is typically only achieved when 70-90% of the population is vaccinated.

Dr Rohn says: “It’s quite a shocking thing to say: ‘I’m going to sit back and reap the benefits of vaccination without actually getting the vaccine myself.

“I think that’s completely selfish because not everyone can get vaccinated. There are people who are too vulnerable and they’re immunocompromised and they’re relying on everyone else to do the right thing.”

United Nations

MYTH: ‘Vaccines contain tissue from aborted foetuses’

This rather horrifying myth is completely untrue. Dr Rohn explains: “You would never put human tissue into a vaccine because it might cause an immune reaction that you don’t want.”

Where the confusion lies, she believes, is with the fetal cells that were used in the early 1960s from legally and electively aborted fetuses for research purposes.

These cells have been reproduced over the years to provide a consistent genetic make-up for conducting vaccine research.

Dr Rohn says: “There are cell lines that we use in the lab all the time that are derived from stem cells.

“Some of them are 50 years old and they’re an essential part of the research arsenal. It’s not like we’re going out and aborting foetuses to do research on them.”

The mRNA vaccine is synthetic and made from a DNA template in a lab, such as the Moderna vaccine – a synthetic vaccine sequenced in a lab. The AstraZeneca vaccine, however, used the cell line from an aborted fetus to develop the vaccine.

Even the seriously anti-abortion Catholic Church said ‘one is morally free’ to use the vaccine if it has been developed using the cell line, despite its historical association with abortion. They add: “This is especially important for parents, who have a moral obligation to protect the life and health of their children and those around them.”

To be clear though – none of the Covid-19 vaccines contain cells from aborted fetuses.

Daniel Schludi / Unsplash

MYTH: ‘Vaccines cause autism’

There is zero scientific evidence to back up this anti-vaccine and ableist conspiracy theory.

This myth is believed to be based upon a fraudulent paper from 1998 that has now been retracted due to clear evidence of falsification of data.

Simply put – vaccines absolutely, scientifically do not cause autism. Anti-vaxxers should also consider why they think so negatively of autism.

MYTH: ‘The vaccine isn’t safe because it’s been developed so quickly’

The Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine smashed the previous record for vaccine development from four years to under one. ‘Understandably, there is concern’, Dr Rohn explains.

Adding: “Usually it takes 10 years and this time it’s taken 10 months, so of course people are going to wonder if any shortcuts have been taken.”

However, the speed at which the vaccine has been developed is simply due to the amount of money and effort put in – the UK alone spent £6 billion to develop and procure the vaccine.

Additionally, vaccine development did not start from scratch. Dr Rohn says: “There’s been an enormous amount of groundwork on these prototypes so we were quick off the mark from a research point of view.

“The actual trials are taking a long time and that’s where nothing is being compromised.

“No reputable regulatory body will approve this without a completed and successful series of clinical trials.”*

*This interview was done before any vaccine was rolled out in the UK.

On vaccine misinformation, a government spokesperson said: “Letting vaccine disinformation spread unchecked could cost British lives.”

They added: “We continue to work closely with social media firms to promote authoritative sources of information so people have access to vaccine facts not fiction.”

See the government’s Covid-19 vaccination guidance here

Continue Reading

Feature

Take a look inside the creepy abandoned Belle Vue Showcase cinema

Who else has great memories of this place?

Published

on

Mark Gardener

The Belle Vue Showcase cinema was somewhat of an iconic venue in Manchester, however, it is set to be demolished and replaced. 

The news came late last year that the cinema would be demolished to make way for a new secondary school.

The school, ran by the Co-op, is planning on having its first year sevens students in by September, although they’ll be placed in temporary buildings.

Sir Robert McAlpine / Space Architects

The new Co-Op Academy Belle Vue school is set to be finished in 2023, and a first glimpse of what it will look like has now been released. 

Newly released documents show a modern L-shaped building, which will be split into three different ‘zones’, including a two-storey sports block – complete with a sports hall, auditorium, and drama studio.

Mark Gardener
Mark Gardener

The iconic cinema first opened its doors in 1989 boasting a huge 14 screens in the entertainment complex.

Closing its doors back in March 2020, the cinema had been left abandoned all last year and started to look seriously creepy. 

Mark Gardener
Mark Gardener

The timeline for demolition hasn’t been given yet, and parents had to have applied for their child’s place in the new school by November 2nd last year – in case you were wanting to. 

Once the grounds of Belle Vue zoo and amusement park, the area will definitely have some stories to tell.

Mark Gardener
Mark Gardener

The Belle Vue Showcase cinema was one of the first multi-screen complexes to open up, bringing American films, no queues and car parks to fit a 1,000 cars – it was unlike anything that had ever been seen before when it first opened back in 1989.

Back in February last year when rumours began to circulate the cinema would be closing, Mark Barlow, general manager at Showcase Cinemas UK, said: “As the leader in UK cinema innovation, Showcase Cinemas remains committed to operating a cinema in Manchester and as such are in active discussions about future opportunities for a new, state-of-art cinema in the city.”

If you’re going to miss this iconic venue, the company are said to be looking into a new unnamed location for another cinema. They added that they ‘remain fully committed to the city’. 

Continue Reading

Receive our latest news, events & unique stories

Privacy and data policy

We may earn a commission when you use one of our links to make a purchase

Copyright © 2019 Proper Manchester